FPGAStudio helps companies design, review, deploy, and validate FPGA and ASIC systems using expert engineering, AI-assisted analysis, and remote FPGA infrastructure.
Four of six services start free →Expert engineering, AI-assisted analysis, and remote FPGA infrastructure. Use one service on its own or chain them together, from a MATLAB algorithm through hardware you can drive over an API.
Your floating-point algorithm turned into synthesizable RTL, with the numerics proven rather than assumed.
An experienced FPGA and ASIC design team you can bring onto your project, from a single block to a full implementation.
Submit your RTL and receive a detailed report covering the categories that actually cause re-spins and late-stage bugs. First 1,000 lines free.
Plain unit-level testbenches driven to a coverage target you can defend in a sign-off review. No UVM, no framework to maintain.
An existing design in trouble and a team that has already spent weeks on it. Send us something we can reproduce and we will find the cause.
FPGA implementation and validation without maintaining local FPGA infrastructure. Upload RTL, get running hardware.
Four of the six services start free: a 1,000-line RTL review, a dynamic range analysis, a unit testbench at 70% coverage, or a full project scope, all with no card required. Beyond that, work is fixed-price by project size, and quoted where the scope cannot be known up front.
Every engagement is backed by production FPGA and ASIC design work, not just tool output. We know where each toolchain lies to you and where the real risks hide.
Six stages, six services, one handoff chain. Come in wherever your project is today.
MATLAB or C algorithm to fixed point to synthesizable RTL, with range analysis.
Architecture, interfaces, clocking, and production RTL with testbenches.
Linting, AI analysis, and expert verification across all eight categories.
Unit testbenches and coverage closure to 80% or 90%, with a regression suite.
Automated synthesis and place-and-route, then bitstream onto real hardware.
Drive the running design over a remote API from your own code or CI.
Uploaded files are deleted 30 days after your report is delivered. Ask at any point and we will delete them sooner.
All uploads travel over HTTPS and are encrypted in storage.
Your source files are never used to train any model and never shared with any other customer.
RTL Pilot builds run in isolated environments, and your bitstream is loaded onto hardware dedicated to your session.
A confidentiality agreement is available for every engagement before you upload anything.
No. Each one stands alone. Plenty of customers only ever use RTL Review. Others hand us a MATLAB algorithm and take delivery of verified RTL. The services are built to chain together, not to be bundled.
Review reads your design and tells you what is wrong with it: CDC crossings, reset structure, timing risk, coding standards. Verification proves the design does what the specification says, by building a testbench and driving coverage to a target. Review is days and finds problems. Verification is weeks and produces the evidence a sign-off needs. Most teams want review first, because verifying a design with known structural defects wastes the effort.
Yes, that is Algorithm to RTL. We take your floating-point model, profile it to find the real dynamic range of every internal signal, build a MATLAB fixed-point version from those measurements, then implement it as synthesizable RTL. You receive the range analysis, the fixed-point model, the RTL, and testbenches that prove the hardware matches your original algorithm.
By measurement, not margin. The floating-point reference is instrumented and run over your representative stimulus to record the actual minimum and maximum each signal reaches. Integer and fractional bits, guard bits, rounding mode, and saturation behavior all follow from that data, against an accuracy target you agree up front.
VHDL, Verilog, and SystemVerilog, for designs targeting AMD Xilinx, Intel/Altera, Lattice, and Microchip devices.
AI analysis broadens coverage across large codebases and catches patterns a linter misses. It does not have the final say. Every finding we report is verified by an FPGA and ASIC subject matter expert before it reaches you.
Files are stored encrypted and deleted 30 days after delivery, or sooner if you ask. They are never used to train any model. See the Security section above.
Yes. A confidentiality agreement is available for every engagement, before you upload anything.
No. That is the point of it. Builds run on our infrastructure and your bitstream is deployed to hosted FPGA hardware you reach over a remote API.
Design work, a review, or remote implementation. Send us the scope and we'll come back with a plan.